8 Tech Execs Who Should NOT Run for Office

8-tech-execs-who-should-not-run-for-office photo 1 Click To View Slideshow» It's probably best these execs stay in Silicon Valley.

The US Constitution outlines three minimum requirements to become president: one must be a natural-born citizen, at least 35 years old, and have lived in the US for 14 years or more.

But public service takes many forms, including Congress and local politics. Ideally, politicians serve as a voice of the people, bring integrity and experience to the position, and steer the nation toward a positive future.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently revealed plans to visit and meet people in 30 states—a move many believe is the start of the entrepreneur's political career. Zuck denied it, and said his focus is on Facebook and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. But he did convince Facebook's board to let him retain control of his company, even if he takes a leave of absence to serve "in a government position or office."

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, meanwhile, just bought the biggest house in Washington, D.C., though he may just want comfy place to rest his head when he visits The Washington Post, which he owns.

The election of real estate exec and TV personality Donald Trump has prompted a closer look at other business types who might pursue the highest office in the land. And while names like Zuckerberg, Cook, Sandberg, and Whitman have been thrown around as possible contenders for the White House, there are a few names in tech that might not be the best choice for Commander in Chief, Senator, or – in some cases – city council, if we're being honest. Of course, Trump's campaign strategy proves anything is possible, so perhaps those featured in the gallery will be making the rounds in D.C. regardless.

Read on for more, and let us know in the comments if you agree.

Click To View Slideshow »

Recommended stories

More stories